The Effect of application methods and chemical insecticides for the attack control of Hypsipyla grandella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on the Swietenia macrophylla King
Palabras clave:
mahogany shoot borer, imidacloprid, spinetoram, emamectin benzoate, trunk microinjectionResumen
Chemical control of the shoot borer (Hypsipyla grandella Zeller) on mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King) forest plantations remains a major challenge. For this reason, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of two application methods of three chemical insecticides plus the control on the response to insect attack, in a completely randomized design (2x4 factorial scheme). A total of 9 evaluations were carried out at intervals of 15 days between the months of May and September (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 days). The variables were standardized (z-function) and then transformed by the fourth root. The significant differences at error of 10% of the F test found at 30 and 45 days of the experiment could not be verified by the parametric tests because the transformations failed to bring the data closer to a standard normal distribution. Then the Kruskal-Wallis H test was performed to verify the differences between insecticides and control and the Mann-Whitney U test for the differences between application methods. The response of the relative number of attacked shoots per tree (rNAST) in the overall imidacloprid and emamectin benzoate groups differed from each other by post-hoc pairwise Dunn's correction with Holm's correction. By comparing the Wilcoxon rank sum in the fourth evaluation it was observed that the effect of emamectin benzoate microinjection on rNAST was smaller than that of the spraying method. In the same evaluation, imidacloprid and emamectin benzoate were differentiated from each other. The graphical analysis showed that in both evaluations the performance of imidacloprid was better than that of the other insecticides for the control of the mahogany shoot borer. The microinjection did not present significant effects; however, it has not impacted the growth of the trees measured by the increases in normal diameter, basal diameter, and total height.
Descargas
Referencias
ALLAN, G. G.; CHOPRA, C.S.; FRIEDHOFF, J.F.; GARA, R.I.; MAGGI, M.W.; NEOGI, A.N.; POWELL, J.C.; ROBERTS, S.C.; WILKINS, R.M. The concept of controlled release insecticides and the problem of shoot borers of the Meliaceae. In: WHITMORE, J.L. (Ed.). Studies on the shootborer Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) Lep. Pyralidae, Vol. II. IICA Miscellaneous Publications No. 101. Costa Rica: CATIE, 1976. p.110–115.
ALLAN, G.G.; GARA, R.I.; WILKINS, R.M. The evaluation of some systemic insecticides for the control of larvae in Cedrela odorata L. In: GRIJPMA, P. (Ed.). Studies on the shootborer Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) Lep. Pyralidae, Vol I. IICA. (Miscellaneous publication No 101)”. Costa Rica: CATIE, 1973. p.40–48.
BARTLETT, M. S. Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A - Mathematical and Physical Sciences, v.160, n.901, p.268–282, 1937. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1937.0109.
BERGER, C.; LAURENT, F. Trunk injection of plant protection products to protect trees from pests and diseases. Crop Protection n.124, p.104831, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.05.025
CHI, N.M.; QUANG, D.N.; HIEN, B.D.; DZUNG, P.N.; NHUNG, N.P.; NAM, N.V.; THUY, P.T.T.; TUONG, D.V.; DELL, B. Management of Hypsipyla robusta Moore (Pyralidae) damage in Chukrasia tabularis A. Juss (Meliaceae). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, v.41, n.4, p.2341–2350, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-020-00405-3
CIBRIÁN TOVAR, D. Manejo del barrenador de las meliáceas, Hypsipyla grandella. In: CIBRIÁN TOVAR, D. (Ed.). Manual para la identificación y manejo de plagas en plantaciones forestales comerciales. México: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, CONAFOR, 2013. p.144–153.
COSLOR, C.C.; VANDERVOORT, C.; WISE, J.C. Insecticide dose and seasonal timing of trunk injection in apples influence efficacy and residues in nectar and plant parts. Pest Management Science, v.75, n.5, p.1453–1463, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5268
DÍAZ-MARTÍNEZ, Y.C.; MALO, E.A.; ALAVEZ-ROSAS, D.; HERNÁNDEZ-MORENO, S.; CRUZ-LÓPEZ, L.; GONZÁLEZ-GÓMEZ, R. Volatiles as Attractants of Mahogany Shoot Borer, Hypsipyla grandella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, v.49, n.1-2, p.77-86, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-022-01398-8
DOCCOLA, J.J.; WILD, P.M. Tree injection as an alternative method of insecticide application. In: SOLONESKI, S. (Ed.). Insecticides - basic and other applications InTech, 2012. p.61–78. https://doi.org/10.5772/29560.
DUNN, O.J. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, v.6, n.3, p.241-252, 1964. https://doi.org/10.2307/1266041
FIELD, A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. UK: SAGE Publications Ltd. 2017. 816p.
FUNDER, D. C.; OZER, D. J. Evaluating effect size in psychological research: sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, v.2, n.2, p.156–168, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
GOULET, E.; RUEDA, A.; SHELTON, A. Management of the mahogany shoot borer, Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), through weed management and insecticidal sprays in 1- and 2-year-old Swietenia humilis Zucc. plantations. Crop Protection, v.24, n.9, p.821–828, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.01.007
GRIFFITHS, M.W. The biology and ecology of Hypsipyla shoot borers. In: FLOYD, R.B.; HAUXWELL, C. (Eds.) Hypsipyla shoot borers in Meliaceae” (Proceedings of an International Workshop held at Kandy, Sri Lanka 20–23 August 1996) Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, 2001. p.74–80.
HOLM, S. A Simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, v.6, n.2, p.65–70, 1979. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
HOWARD, F.W.; MERIDA, M.A. El taladrador de las meliáceas, Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Phycitinae). Extension Data Information Source (UF/IFAS), 2004. 11p. https://journals.flvc.org/edis/article/download/114880/113211/
KATHURIA, D.; BHATTU, M.; BANKAR, A.; PURI, P. A Review on methods for the elimination of imidacloprid: 2018–2022. ChemistrySelect, v.8, n.34, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202302293
KUMAR, C. T. A.; REMADEVI, O. K.; AMINU-TAIWO, B. R. Pest Management in Tropical Forests. In: CHAKRAVARTHY, A. (Ed.). Innovative Pest Management Approaches for the 21st Century. Singapore: Springer, 2020. p.227–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0794-6_12
KRUSKAL, W. H.; WALLIS, W. A. Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, v.47, n.260, p.583-621, 1952. https://doi.org/10.2307/2280779
LEVENE, H. Robust tests for equality of variances. In: OLKIN, I.; GHURYE, S. G.; HOEFFING, W.; MADOW, W. G.; MANN, H. B. (Eds.) Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1960. p.278–292.
LILLIEFORS, H. W. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for normality with mean and variance unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association, v.62, n.318, p. 399–402, 1967.
MAESTRI, M.P.; AQUINO, M.G.C.; RABELO, L.K.L. A praga do mogno brasileiro: Hypsipyla grandella Zeller. Revista Biodiversidade, v.19, n.3, p.24–39, 2020.
MANN, H. B.; WHITNEY, D. R. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, v.8, n.1, p.50–60, 1947.
MAYHEW, J.E.; NEWTON, A.C. The silviculture of mahogany. New York: CABI Publishing, 1998. 226p.
MOREIRA, X.; ABDALA-ROBERTS, L.; PARRA-TABLA, V.; MOONEY, K.A. Positive effects of plant genotypic and species diversity on anti-herbivore defenses in a tropical tree species. PLoS ONE, v.9, n.8, p. e105438, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105438.
NEWTON, A.C.; BAKER, P.; RAMNARINE, S.; MESÉN, J.F.; LEAKEY, R.R.B. The mahogany shoot borer: prospects for control. Forest Ecology and Management, v.57, n.1–4, p.301–328, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(93)90179-Q.
PATIL, I. Visualizations with statistical details: The “ggstatsplot” approach. Journal of Open Source Software, v.6, n.61, p. 3167. 2021. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03167.
PINEDA-RÍOS, J.M.; CIBRIÁN TOVAR, J.; MACÍAS SÁMANO, J.; SALOMÉ ABARCA, L.F.; LÓPEZ ROMERO, R.M.; ARJONA SUÁREZ, E. de J. La composición y proporción de los componentes de la feromona sexual de Hypsipyla grandella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) varía dependiendo de la técnica utilizada para su aislamiento. Entomotropica, v.31, n.21, p.172–185, 2016.
PULGARÍN DÍAZ, J. A.; CAÑAS MESA, V.; PÉREZ-PÉREZ, J.; MÁRQUEZ, E. J. Size and shape variation of Hypsipyla grandella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in two hosts: A morphometric approach. Zoologischer Anzeiger, v.302, p. 304–309, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2022.12.005.
PULGARÍN DÍAZ, J.A.; CANO GALLEGO, L.E.; HERRERA-FLOREZ, A.F.; QUIROZ GAMBOA, J.A. First report of Zethus schadei (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) as natural enemy of Hypsipyla grandella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) from Colombia. Acta Zoológica Mexicana, v.34, p.1–3, 2018. https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2018.3412119.
R CORE TEAM. 2023. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/.
SAMMANI, A.M.P.; DISSANAYAKA, D.M.S.K.; WIJAYARATNE, L.K.W.; MORRISON, W.R. Effects of spinosad and spinetoram on larval mortality; adult emergence; progeny production and mating in Cadra cautella (Walk.) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, v. 88, p. 101665, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2020.101665.
SÁNCHEZ-SOTO, S.; DOMÍNGUEZ-DOMÍNGUEZ, M.; CORTÉS-MADRIGAL, H. Effect of shade on mahogany plants about the incidence of Hypsipyla grandella Zeller and other insects in Tabasco, Mexico. Universidad y Ciencia Trópico Húmedo, v.25, n.3, p.225–232, 2009.
SIAL, A.A.; BRUNNER, J.F. Toxicity and residual efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole; Spinetoram; and Emamectin Benzoate to Obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, v.103, n.4, p.1277-1285, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC09389
SINGH, J.P.; GUPTA, P.K.; CHANDRA, U.; SINGH, V.K. Bioefficacy of newer insecticides and biopesticides against brinjal shoot and fruit borer Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). International Journal of Plant Protection, v.9, n.1, p.1–7, 2016. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJPP/9.1/1-7.
SOLOMON, J.D. Guide to insect borers in North American broadleaf trees and shrubs (Agriculture Handbook AH-706). Washington, D.C: United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. 1995. 735p.
WICKHAM, H.; CHANG, W.; HENRY, L.; PEDERSEN, T. L.; TAKAHASHI, K.; WILKE, C.; WOO, K.; YUTANI, H.; DUNNINGTON, D.; POSIT, P. Package ‘ggplot2’. Create elegant data visualisations using the grammar of graphics (version 3.4.4). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing, 2023. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/index.html
WYLIE, F. R. Control of Hypsipyla spp. shoot borers with chemical pesticides: a Review. In: FLOYD, R.B.; HAUXWELL, C. (Eds.). Hypsipyla shoot borers in Meliaceae. Proceedings of an International Workshop held at Kandy; Sri Lanka 20–23 August 1996. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. 2001. p.109–115.
YUE, B.; WILDE, G.E.; ARTHUR, F. Evaluation of Thiamethoxam and Imidacloprid as seed treatments to control european corn borer and indianmeal moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) Larvae. Journal of Economic Entomology, v.96, n.2, p.503–509, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/96.2.503.
ZHANG, S.-K.; REN, X.-B.; WANG, Y.-C.; SU, J. Resistance in Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to new chemistry insecticides. Journal of Economic Entomology, v.107, n.2, p.815–820, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC13506.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Caleb Cruz García , David Cibrián Tovar , Antonio Villanueva Morales, Israel Aquino Bolaños, Víctor David Cibrián Llanderal, Guilherme Amorim Homem de Abreu Loureiro
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
DECLARAÇÃO DE ORIGINALIDADE E DIREITOS AUTORAIS
Declaro que o presente artigo é original, não tendo sido submetido à publicação em qualquer outro periódico nacional ou internacional, quer seja em parte ou em sua totalidade.
Os direitos autorais pertencem exclusivamente aos autores. Os direitos de licenciamento utilizados pelo periódico é a licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY NC ND 4.0)
Recomenda-se a leitura desse link para maiores informações sobre o tema: fornecimento de créditos e referências de forma correta, entre outros detalhes cruciais para uso adequado do material licenciado.
A obra Revista de Ciências Agroambientais (ISSN 1677-6062) está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
