GESTÃO DE STAKEHOLDERS E ESTRATÉGIAS PARA ALCANÇAR METAS GLOBAIS DE BIODIVERSIDADE: DESAFIOS E IMPACTOS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30681/rcc.v4i17.13193Palavras-chave:
Biodiversidade; Gestão de Stakeholders; Metas Globais.Resumo
Este estudo explora a relação entre as metas globais de biodiversidade e a gestão de stakeholders por meio de uma abordagem integrada, baseada nas Metas Globais de Biodiversidade do Marco Global da Biodiversidade de Kunming-Montreal (CDB, 2022). A pesquisa começou com a organização e classificação dessas metas em uma tabela sistematizada para facilitar a análise subsequente. Utilizando a metodologia do Project Management Institute (PMI, 2021), foram mapeadas e identificadas as partes interessadas que impactam ou são impactadas pelas metas, incluindo governos, empresas privadas, ONGs, comunidades indígenas, cientistas e o público geral. Este estudo contribui para a literatura ao demonstrar como a gestão eficaz de stakeholders pode apoiar a realização das metas globais de biodiversidade.
Downloads
Referências
ACKERMANN, F.; EDEN, C. Making Strategy: Mapping Out Strategic Success. Sage Publications, 2021.
ARMITAGE, D. et al. Governance principles for community-centered conservation in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Conservation Science and Practice, v. 2, n. 2, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.200. Acesso em: 12 de fev. 2024.
ARTS, B.; MACK, S. Environmental NGOs and the biosafety protocol: a case study on political influence. 2003.
BOURNE, L. Stakeholder Relationship Management: A Maturity Model for Organisational Implementation. Gower Publishing, Ltd., 2015.
BROWN, H.; GREEN, T. Barriers to the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: Evidence from the field. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107159.
CBD - CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. Post-2023 Global Biodiversity Framework. Kumming: CBD, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.cbd.int/gbf. Acesso em: 12 de fev. 2024.
COONEY, R. The precautionary principle in biodiversity conservation and natural resource management: an issues paper for policy-makers, researchers and practitioners. 2004.
DIAZ, S.; SETTELE, J.; BRONDIZIO, E. S.; et al. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy0020Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany: IPBES, 2019.
ECKELMAN, M. J.; SHERMAN, J. Environmental impacts of the US health care system and effects on public health. PloS one, 2016. Disponível em: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157014. Acesso em: 12 de fev. 2024.
GAUCHAN, D.G. et al. Policy incentives for conservation and the sustainable use of crop genetic resources in Nepal. 2005.
GEELS, F. W.; SOVACOOL, B. K.; SCHWANEN, T.; SORRELL, S. The socio-technical dynamics of low-carbon transitions. Joule, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.018.
KHAN, S. A. R. et al. Re-investigating the nexuses of renewable energy, natural resources andtransport services: a roadmap towards sustainable development. Springer, 2022.
LEAL FILHO, Walter; BRANDLI, Luciana. Engaging Stakeholders for Sustainable Development. Janeiro 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26734-0_21.
LEE, K.; CHANG, S. Balancing infrastructure expansion and environmental conservation in the energy sector. Energy Policy, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.037.
MOOG, S.; SPICER, A.; BÖHM, S. The politics of multi-stakeholder initiatives: The crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council. Springer, [s.d.]. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-2033-3
NIESENBAUM, Richard A. The Integration of Conservation, Biodiversity, and Sustainability. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 17, p. 4676, 28 agosto 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11174676.
O'CONNOR, M.; DAVIS, R. Intellectual property rights in biotechnology: Addressing new challenges. Biotechnology Advances, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107537.
PÉREZ VERA, Y.; BERMUDEZ PEÑA, A. Stakeholders Classification System Based on Clustering Techniques. Springer, 2018.
PNUMA. (2021): Global Environment Outlook-6. Disponível em: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/27539/GEO6_2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Acesso em: 12 fev. 2024.
PMI - PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). 7. ed. Newtown Square, PA: PMI, 2021.
RABECHINI JR., Roque; ABARCA, Eddy Alberto Morris; SALCEDO, Nestor U.; HORNA SALDAÑA, Cesar Jhonnatan P.; PAIVA, Danielle Cruz. Gestión de stakeholders y oficina de gestión de proyectos: Efecto en los resultados. Rev. adm. empres, v. 62, n. 06, 2022. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020220606.
RAMIREZ, R. Stakeholder analysis and conflict management. Google Books, 1999.
REED, Mark S. et al. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. ScienceDirect, 2009.
SANTILLI, J. Agrobiodiversity and the Law: regulating genetic resources, food security and cultural diversity. 2012.
SMITH, T.; JONES, M. Why consumers don't see the benefits of sustainability: A cognitive dissonance perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 2019. DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucz050.
SOBNOSKY, Kevin J. Effective Communication in Environmental Management. Environmental Quality Management, v. 11, n. 1, p. 47-56, setembro 2001. DOI: 10.1002/tqem.1204.
Recebido: 24/09/2024
Aprovado: 15/10/2024
Publicado: 20/12/2024
