A sociolinguística como uma corrente teórico-metodológica da linguística sob um viés histórico

Autores

  • ALLAN CORDEIRO DA SILVEIRA UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL FLUMINENSE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30681/2594.9063.2020v4n1id4627

Resumo

A Sociolinguística tem se apresentado como uma disciplina muito prolífica nos últimos 50 anos. O objetivo do trabalho é apresentar um panorama histórico da Sociolinguística como uma corrente teórico-metodológica da Linguística, abordando assuntos acerca da trajetória histórica dos dialetos, do surgimento das línguas nacionais e da exclusão da diversidade linguística. Definições, importância das diferenças dialetais e dos fatores que influenciam na variação linguística são debatidas. Resultados apontam que a tendência das pesquisas em Sociolinguística é a promoção do entendimento das peculiaridades do falante e da valorização da diversidade linguística nas comunidades de fala.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

ALLAN CORDEIRO DA SILVEIRA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL FLUMINENSE

Possui graduação em Letras pela Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (2011), graduação em Letras Inglês pela Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (2013), mestrado em Linguística Aplicada pela Universidade de Londres (2016) e mestrado em Estudos de Linguagem pela Universidade Federal Fluminense (2020). Atualmente, cursa doutorado em Estudos de Linguagem pela Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) na linha de pesquisa de história, política e contato linguístico. Tem experiência na área de Ensino, com ênfase em Linguística Aplicada e Relações Interculturais.

Referências

AUROUX, Sylvain. A revolução tecnológica da gramatização. Campinas: Unicamp, 1992.

BERNSTEIN, Basil. Class, Codes, and Control. 2. ed. London: Routledge, p. 1974–75. v. 3, 1971.

______. Language and Social Class. British Journal of Sociology, London: LSE, v. 1, p. 271–276, set 1960.

BICKERTON, Derek. Pidgin and creole linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977.

BLOMMAERT, Jan. Commentary: A sociolinguistics of globalization. Journal of sociolinguistics, Amsterdam, v. 7, n. 4, p. 607–623, dez 2003.

______. The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

BODINE, Ann. Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: singular ‘they’, sex-indefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’1. Language in society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. v. 4, n. 2, p. 129–146, ago 1975.

BYRAM, Michael. Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 1997.

CANAGARAJAH, Suresh. Lingua franca English, multilingual communities, and language acquisition. The modern language journal, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell v. 91, p. 923–939, 2007.

CEZARIO, M. M.; VOTRE, S. Sociolinguística. In.: MARTELLOTA, M. E. (Org.). Manual de Linguística. São Paulo: Contexto. p. 141–155, 2016.

COLLIN, Finn. Ethnomethodology. In: Social Reality. London: Routledge, p. 39–60, 2012.

COOK, Vivian. Nativeness and language pedagogy. The encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Wiley Online Library, 2012.

CURRIE, Haver C. A Projection of Sociolinguistics: The Relationship of Speech to Social Status. Southern Speech Journal, v. 18, p. 28-37, 1952.

ECKERT, Penelope. Language Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998.

______. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2000.

FEAGIN, Crawford. Variation and change in Alabama English: A sociolinguistic study of the white community. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1979.

FERGUSON, Charles. Diglossia. Word, v. 15, n. 2, p. 325–340, 1959.

FISHMAN, Joshua A. Language and Nationalism: Two Integrative Essays. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers, 1972.

______. Language in Sociocultural Change: Essays. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1972.

FRANCIS, David; HESTER, Stephen. An invitation to ethnomethodology: Language, society and interaction. Sage, 2004.

FRANCIS, Winthrop Nelson. Dialectology: an introduction. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd, 1983.

FRIEDRICH, Paul. Review of Ferguson and Gumperz. Language p. 163-168, 1961

GARFINKEL, Harold. Studies in ethnomethodology. 1967.

GAUCHAT, Louis. L'unite phonetique dans le patois d'une commune. Aus romanischen Sprachen und Literaturen:Festschrift fur Heinrich Mort. Halle: Niemeyer, p. 175–232, 1905.

GENTNER, Dedre. Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report, n. 257, 982.

GUMPERZ, John J.. Dialect differences and social stratification in a North Indian village. American anthropologist, v. 60, n. 4, p. 668–682, 1958.

______. Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. American anthropologist, v. 66, p. 137-153, 1964.

______. Languagein Social Groups:Essays.Ed. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1971.

______. The sociolinguistic significance of conversational code-switching. RELC journal, v. 8, n. 2, p. 1–34, 1977.

______. LEVINSON, Stephen C. Rethinking linguistic relativity. Current Anthropology, v. 32, n. 5, p. 613–623, 1991.

HALLIDAY, M. A. Language as social semiotic: Towards a general sociolinguistic theory. In: The first lacus forum. Californian: Hornbeam Press, p. 17–46, 1975.

HAUGEN, Einar I. The Norwegian language in America: A study in bilingual. v.1, Blommington: Indiana University Press, 1969.

______. Dialect, Language, Nation 1. American anthropologist, v. 68, n. 4, p. 922–935, 1966.

______. The ecology of language. Linguistic Reporter, v. 13, n. 1, p. 19–26, 1971.

HERMANN, Eduard. Lautveränderungen in der Individualsprache einer Mundart.. Nachrichtender Gesellschaft der WissenschaftenzuGittingen, v. 9, p. 195–214, 1929.

HERNÁNDEZ-CAMPOY, Juan Manuel. Research methods in Sociolinguistics. AILA Review, v. 27, n. 1, p. 5–29, 2014.

HERNÁNDEZ-CAMPOY, Juan Manuel.; CUTILLAS-ESPINOSA, ANTONIO, Juan. Introduction: Style-shifting revisited.In: HERNÁNDEZ-CAMPOY, J.M.; CUTILLAS-ESPINOSA, J.A(eds). Style-Shifting in Public: New Perspectives on Stylistic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012. p. 1–18.

HILBERT, Richard. A. The classical roots of ethnomethodology: Durkheim, Weber, and Garfinkel. Chappel Hill: UNC Press Books, 2001.

HOCH, Shawn; HAYES, James J. Geolinguistics: The Incorporation of Geographic Information Systems and Science. Geographical Bulletin, v. 51, n. 1, 2010.

HOFFMANN, Charlotte. Introduction to bilingualism. London: Routledge, 2014.

HOLMES, Janet; WILSON, Nick. An introduction to sociolinguistics. London: Routledge, 2017

HOLMES, Janet; MEYERHOFF, Miriam (Ed.). The handbook of language and gender. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

HORNBERGER, Nancy H.; CORSON, David; CORSON, P. (Ed.). Research Methods in Language and Education: 8. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 1999.

HUDSON, Richard Anthony. Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

HYMES, Dell. On communicative competence. Sociolinguistics, p. 269–293, 1972.

HYMES, Dell; GUMPERZ, John Joseph (Ed.). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972.

______. On communicative competence. Sociolinguistics, p. 269–293, 1972.

______. Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. London Routledge, 2013.

IRVINE, Judith T. When talk isn't cheap: Language and political economy. American ethnologist, v. 16, n. 2, p. 248–267,1989.

JABERG, Karl. Sprachgeographie: BeitragzumVerständnis des Atlas linguistique de la France. Aarau: Sauerländer, v. 1, 1908.

JENKINS, Jennifer. English as a lingua franca: Attitude and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

______. The Linguistic Individual: Self-Expression in Language and Linguistics. Oxford: OUP Oxford: Elsevier, 1996.

KOERNER, Konrad. Toward a history of modern sociolinguistics. American Speech, v. 66, n. 1, p. 57-70, 1991.

______. William Labov and the origins of sociolinguistics. Folia linguística histórica, v. 35, p. 1–40, 2001.

KOUWENBERG, Silvia; SINGLER, John Victor (Ed.). The handbook of pidgin and creole studies. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2009.

LABOV, William. Building on empirical foundations. In: Directions for Historical Linguistics, 1982.

______. Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, v. 45, p. 715–762, 1969.

LABOV, W. Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In: BAUGH, J.; SHERZER, J. (eds). Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics. Englewoods Cliffs NJ:Prentice Hall,1984.p. 28–66

______. Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972a.

______. Objectivity and commitment in linguistic science: The case of the Black English trial in Ann Arbor. Language in Society, v.11, n. 2, p. 165–201, 1982.

______. On the mechanism of linguistic change. Monograph Series of Languages and Linguistics, v.18, p. 91–114, 1965.

______. Principles of linguistic change - Internal factors.Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.

______. Principles of Linguistic Change, I: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.

______. Principles of Linguistic Change, II: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.

______. Principles of Linguistic Change, III: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Malden MA:Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.

______. Quantitative reasoning in linguistics. 2008. Disponível em: http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~wlabov/Papers/QRL.pdf. Acesso em: 28 fev 2019.

______. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972b.

______. The social motivation of a language change.Word, v.19, p. 273–309, 1963.

______. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1966.

______. The social stratification of English in New York City. 2. ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

______. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1966.

LEUNG, Constant. Convivial communication: Recontextualizing communicative competence. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, v. 15, n. 2, p. 119–144, 2005.

MACKEY, William F. Geolinguistics: Its scope and principles. Language in geographic context. p. 20–46, 1988.

______. Language diversity, language policy and the sovereign state. History of European Ideas, v. 13, p. 51–61, 1991.

______. The ecology of language shift. The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology, and environment, p. 67–74, 2001.

______. Three concepts for geolinguistics. Centre international de recherche sur le bilinguisme – International Center for Research on Bilingualism, 1973.

______. Literary diglossia, biculturalism and cosmopolitanism in literature. Visible language, v. 27, n. 1, p. 40, 1993.

MAINGUENEAU, Dominique. Discurso e Análise do Dircurso. Trad de Sírio Possenti. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2015.

MALKIEL, Yakov. From Romance philology through dialect geography to sociolinguistics. International Journal of the sociology of language, v. 9, p. 59-84, 1976.

MARTINET, A. Review of Sever Pop.Word, v.8, p. 260–262, 1952.

MCDAVID JÚNIOR, Raven I. Dialect Geography and Social Science Problems. Social Forces, v. 25, p. 168–172, 1946.

______. Postvocalic /-r/ in South Carolina: A Social Analysis. American Speech, v. 23, p. 194–203, 1948.

MEILLET, Antoine. Comment les mots changent de sens. L’Année sociologique (1896/1897-1924/1925), v. 9, p. 1–38, 1904.

MILROY, Lesley; GORDON, Matthew. Sociolinguistics: Method and Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.

MILROY, Lesley. Language ideologies and linguistic change. Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections, p. 161–177, 2004.

MONTEAGUDO, Henrique. A invenção do monolinguismo e da língua nacional. Niterói: Editora Gragoatá, 2012. v. 17, n. 32.

NINYOLES, Rafael L. 1985. Estrutura social e política lingüística. Vigo: Ir indo, 1985. cap. 4–5.

ORLANDI, Eni. Análise de discurso: princípios e procedimentos. Campinas: Pontes, 1990

PECHEUX, Michel. Semântica e Discurso: Uma crítica à afirmação do óbvio. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp, 2009.

PENNYCOOK, Alastair. Global Englishes and transcultural flows. London: Routledge, 2006.

POSSENTI, Sírio. Questões para analistas do discurso. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2009.

ROMAINE, Suzanne. Bilingualism. Honoken: Wiley-Blackwell,1995.

______. Socio-historical linguistics: its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [1982].

SCHILLING-ESTES, N. Investigating stylistic variation. In: CHAMBERS, J.K., TRUDGILL, P.; SCHILLING-ESTES, N. (eds).The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002. p. 375–401

SCHILLING-ESTES, N. Sociolinguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge: CUP, 2013.

SCHNEIDER, Edgar. Investigating variation and change in written documents. In: CHAMBERS, P. Trudgill; Schilling-Estes,N., The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, p. 67–96, 2002.

SEIDLHOFER, Barbara. . Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca. Annual review of applied linguistics, v. 24,p. 209–239, 2004.

______. Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International journal of applied linguistics, v. 11, n. 2, p. 133–158, 2001.

______. English as a lingua franca. ELT journal, v. 59, n. 4, p. 339–341, 2005.

______. Understanding English as a lingua franca-Oxford Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

SOMMERFELT, A. Sur la propagation des changements phonétiques.NorskTidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap, v.4, p. 76–128, 1930.

TRUDGILL, Petter J. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: CUP,1974.

______. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.

VENDRYES, Joseph. Language: linguistic introduction to history. London: Routledge -Kegan Paul, 1925.

WALLIS, Ethel. "Sociolinguistics in Relation to Mezquital Otomi Transition Education." Estudios antropologicos en homenaje al doctor Manuel Gamco. Mexico, DF: Sociedad Mexicana de Antropologia, p. 523-535, 1956.

WEINREICH, Max. Tsveyshprakhikayt: Mutershpracht un tsveyte shprakh. Yipo-Bleter, v. 1, p. 301-16, 1931.

WEINREICH, Uriel. Is a structural dialectology possible? Word, v. 10, n. 2-3, p. 388–400, 1954.

______. Languages in contact: Problems andfindings. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York, 1953.

______. Research problems in Bilingualism, with special regard to Switzerland. 1951.

WEINREICH, Uriel; LABOV, William; HERZOG, Marvin. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. New York: Columbia University 1968.

WHITNEY, William Dwight. Language and the study of language: twelve lectures on the principles of linguistic science. New York: Charles Scribner & Company, 1867.

WIDDOWSON, Henry George. Discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

WREDE, Ferdinand. Ethnographie und Dialektwissenschaft. HistorischeZeitschrift, v. 88, n. 52, p. 22–43, 1902.

Publicado

2020-09-21

Como Citar

DA SILVEIRA, A. C. (2020). A sociolinguística como uma corrente teórico-metodológica da linguística sob um viés histórico. Traços De Linguagem - Revista De Estudos Linguísticos, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30681/2594.9063.2020v4n1id4627